Sorry, we don't support your browser.  Install a modern browser
This post is closed.

standalone desktop version of SimplyPrint Slicer#832

I really like the UI of your Cloud Slicer and was wondering whether you would consider releasing a standalone desktop version of it.

Specifically, I would be interested in using the same UI as a desktop application, such as Electron, but with the actual slicing performed locally on the user’s computer rather than through the SimplyPrint cloud.

Essentially, the idea would be to have a desktop frontend for the slicing engines you already support, while keeping the processing entirely local. I think the UI you have already developed would make a very good standalone slicer frontend, compared to current WxWidget implementations in OrcaSlicer, PrusaSlicer, BambuStudio, etc.

Would this be something you might consider developing or open-sourcing as a separate application?

Thanks.

6 hours ago
Changed the status to
Archived
6 hours ago

I’m afraid we can rule that out - it would be cool(ish), but it would defeat the purpose of our slicer, it would double the workload and most that use our slicer use it because they don’t have a desktop computer that can run the slicer engines. SimplyPrint is web-based, we do have a PWA so you can “install” it and run it, a biiit like an Electron app - though with everything being web-and-cloud-based.

Thanks for taking the time to put in a suggestion though! We try to be honest and up front about these things, so when we see a suggestion that we know ain’t gonna happen, we’d rather say right away than give a “PR-answer” and let hope build up.

6 hours ago
1

Thanks for the honest answer. That makes sense.

Would you ever consider separating the SimplyPrint Slicer frontend from the cloud backend, or potentially releasing/licensing the frontend so it could be used with a locally running slicer engine? I really like the UI you’ve built, and I think there is value in having it as a frontend that users could connect to local CuraEngine, OrcaSlicer, or PrusaSlicer installations. SimplyPrint wouldn’t necessarily need to support local slicing itself; it could just provide the frontend while the community handles the local engine integration.

Thanks again for the response.

6 hours ago

Hard to say. Potentially, but in that case it would most likely be an Enterprise-feature (self-hosting and all that). On lower tiers, our slicer caters more to those who don’t have a computer that can handle a desktop slicer, and most likely do not have or want a home server - so, for hobbyists; very doubtful I’d say. What’s the use-case? You mention the same slicers already provide.

6 hours ago

The use-case is mainly the UI itself. I don’t particularly like the desktop UI of the existing slicers, and I’ve found wxWidgets (the GUI libraryused by Slic3r and its derivatives) to be limiting and/or restrictive to modify. I really like the interface of SimplyPrint’s slicer, so I was wondering whether it could potentially be used as a frontend for a local slicer engine instead. I realize that’s a fairly niche use case, but building a completely new slicer UI from scratch would be a substantial project, whereas you already have a UI that I think works very well and appears to be built on a more modern and flexible stack.

5 hours ago

What, beyond the fact that there would potentially not be a monthly slicing limit, and then speed, would be the benefit of not using our cloud for the slicing though?

5 hours ago

offline use and, use with slicer engines you don’t currently support, such as preflight or nightly versions of orcaslicer and its various forks

5 hours ago